https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39272 n = 12, 2 with supplemental photos of food items consumed), estimated food records (EFRs; n = 11), FFQs (n = 10), weighed food records (WFRs, n = 5), and diet histories (n = 2). Meta-analyses identified underestimation of TEI by females and males, ranging from −1318 kJ/d (95% CI: −1967, −669) for FFQ to −2650 kJ/d (95% CI: −3492, −1807) for 24-h recalls for females, and from −1764 kJ/d (95% CI: −2285, −1242) for FFQ to −3438 kJ/d (95% CI: −5382, −1494) for WFR for males. There was no difference in the level of underestimation by sex, except when using EFR, for which males underestimated energy intake more than females (by 590 kJ/d, 95% CI: 35, 1,146). Conclusion: Substantial underestimation of TEI across a range of dietary assessment methods was identified, similar by sex. These underestimations should be considered when assessing TEI and interpreting diet–disease relations.]]> Wed 10 Aug 2022 10:51:27 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:47845 Thu 02 Feb 2023 15:50:50 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32853 Mon 30 Sep 2019 11:50:18 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:37432 Mon 16 Nov 2020 17:04:51 AEDT ]]>